In the landscape of modern personality frameworks, Ontolokey is one of the first models attempting to bridge classical Jungian cognitive functions with a more dynamic, developmental perspective. Where many systems focus on strengths, preferences, or behavioral tendencies, Ontolokey places particular emphasis on the unconscious architecture of the mind — and especially on a function that is often overlooked: the tertiary function, referred to in Ontolokey as the Blindspot.
This Blindspot is not simply a “weak side” or a minor preference. According to Ontolokey, it represents a childlike, archaic mode of functioning that the adult personality often fails to regulate. When triggered, it produces dependency, overreaction, and irrational vulnerability. Its impact is sometimes subtle, and sometimes dramatically visible in patterns of avoidance, interpersonal conflict, or sudden loss of autonomy.
In this article, we will explore how the Blindspot forms, why it behaves the way it does, and what this means for individuals whose tertiary function is something highly consequential — like Extraverted Thinking (Te). By connecting the Ontolokey model to Jung, modern cognitive-function theorists, neuropsychology, and personality development research, we can gain a richer understanding of why this archetype holds so much power in shaping human behavior.
1. The Ontolokey System: A Brief Overview
Ontolokey builds upon Carl Gustav Jung’s theory of psychological types (1921), which introduced the idea that each personality is guided by a hierarchy of cognitive functions. Jung emphasized that these functions have different levels of consciousness, and that our most “primitive” or least differentiated functions tend to behave instinctively or irrationally.
Later, the Myers–Briggs model (MBTI), as well as the Socionics Model A, adapted Jung’s ideas into a typology, but often oversimplified the developmental complexity. Cognitive-function theorists like John Beebe, Linda Berens, Dario Nardi, and others sought to expand the original Jungian layers by re-introducing concepts like:
- The Archetypal Unconscious
- Developmental hierarchies
- Shadow functions
- Compensatory psychological dynamics
Ontolokey goes a step further by integrating:
- developmental psychology
- archetypal roles
- behavioral patterns under stress
- the relational impact of unconscious functions
In this system, the tertäre Funktion — the third function — is not merely “childlike” but is conceptualized as a Blindspot: a domain where the individual becomes dependent, naive, reactive, or easily manipulated.
In contrast to Socionics Model A, Ontolokey places the Blindspot not in the Mental Ring but in the Vital Ring, where unconscious, pre-rational patterns dominate. Socionics uses the term PoLR (Point of Least Resistance) to denote the most vulnerable function in the Mental Ring and often refers to it as the “blind spot.” Ontolokey, however, argues that the Mental Ring is significantly more conscious and more structurally accessible than the Vital Ring, and therefore the true Blindspot must lie in the latter. Interestingly, both systems ultimately point to the same functional domain, but with opposite polarity: if Socionics identifies the PoLR as Se, Ontolokey identifies the corresponding Blindspot as Si; if the PoLR is Ti, the Ontolokey Blindspot is Te, and so forth. In this sense, the Ontolokey “Toddler Function”—the least developed function of the Mental Ring—always corresponds to the Socionics PoLR, even though each system assigns it to a different energetic orientation.
Socionics also labels the tertiary function as “Demonstrative” because the individual expresses it outwardly without conscious awareness. Ontolokey interprets this same phenomenon as evidence of the Blindspot: a function that is visible to everyone except the person using it. For example, a male ESFP with tertiary Te may project an archaic, underdeveloped form of dominance, becoming fascinated with war narratives, heroic conquest, or fantasies of being an invincible ruler or king. Although these behaviors are externally noticeable, the individual remains unaware that they stem from an immature Te function. This lack of self-recognition — the inability to see what others clearly observe — aligns precisely with Ontolokey’s definition of the Blindspot.
2. What Is the Blindspot?
Ontolokey describes the Blindspot as:
“A suppressed but emotionally charged function that never matured beyond an archaic, childlike stage.”
This aligns closely with Jung’s description of “inferior and tertiary functions” as archaic remnants of the psyche that lack differentiation, discipline, or conscious integration.
Where the dominant function is confident and adult, the Blindspot is:
- impulsive
- insecure
- easily influenced
- driven by unmet needs
- lacking self-regulation
- relationally dependent
The Blindspot often surfaces only in:
- moments of stress
- interpersonal tension
- emotional neediness
- loss of control
- unexpected conflict
When it does, it tends to hijack the personality with primitive instincts, often surprising even the individual themselves.
3. Why the Blindspot Is “Childish” and “Archaic”
Three psychological principles explain this:
1. Cognitive Energy Allocation
Jung believed psychological energy (libido) is not distributed equally.
The dominant and auxiliary functions receive the most investment.
The tertiary, by contrast, remains:
- half-formed
- indulgent
- emotionally immature
Like a child that never grows up.
2. Developmental Delay
Research in personality development (McAdams, Loevinger, Kegan) shows that psychological capacities develop sequentially.
The tertiary function rarely receives training, social reinforcement, or consistent use.
It becomes a dormant structure, activated only in regression.
3. Neuropsychological Underuse
Dario Nardi’s EEG research demonstrates that people show reduced neural efficiency in their lower functions — matching Ontolokey’s idea of archaic behavior.
The tertiary function literally fires less efficiently.
4. The Blindspot as a Source of Dependency
One of Ontolokey’s most important insights is that the Blindspot does not merely lead to incompetence — it leads to dependency.
Because the tertiary function is experienced as insecure and unstable, individuals seek external regulation from others.
They look for someone to play the “adult” in the area where their own psyche is “childlike.”
Examples:
- Someone with tertiary Feeling depends on others for emotional validation.
- Someone with tertiary Sensing depends on others for structure and routine.
- Someone with tertiary Intuition depends on others for meaning or vision.
- Someone with tertiary Thinking depends on others for order, fairness, or boundaries.
This external reliance makes humans manipulable, often without realizing it.
Ontolokey’s Blindspot is therefore not just a cognitive weakness, but a relational vulnerability.
5. When Extraverted Thinking (Te) Is the Blindspot: The ESFP & ENFP Case
Let us examine these examples: ESFPs and ENFPs, whose tertiary (Blindspot) function is Extraverted Thinking (Te).
Te in its mature form (as seen in types like ENTJ or ESTJ) provides:
- structural clarity
- objective decision-making
- legal reasoning
- organizational strength
- ethical frameworks based on fairness
- rule-based social stability
These individuals often excel in professions such as law, engineering, politics, management, or public administration.
But what happens when Te remains underdeveloped?
Ontolokey argues that tertiary Te manifests in a primitive, reactive form:
- control dynamics
- overreliance on authority figures
- impulsive attempts to impose order
- black-and-white thinking
- susceptibility to ideological manipulation
This aligns with Jung, who warned that the underdeveloped Thinking function tends to produce rigid judgments, moralizing, or bursts of aggression.
6. The “Warrior Archetype” and the Biology of Reactivity
Some individuals, especially men with high testosterone, may express this primitive Te through aggressive, dominance-oriented instincts.
Testosterone is correlated with dominance-seeking, not necessarily violence (Archer, 2006).
- Dominance can be expressed prosocially (leadership, protection) or antisocially (aggression, coercion).
- When combined with an underdeveloped cognitive regulatory system (like tertiary Te), the person may fall back into archaic behavior patterns.
Thus, Ontolokey’s view is not that Te “causes war,” but that underdeveloped executive functions fail to regulate instinctive impulses, leading to overcompensation:
- seeking to dominate others
- submitting to strong authority
- enforcing order impulsively
- responding to conflict with escalation instead of logic
This fits Jung’s notion of the “shadow warrior” archetype — a primitive form of Thinking that fights, conquers, and controls because it lacks maturity and ethical grounding.
7. Te as Law vs. Te as Control
A powerful contrast emerges when we compare developed vs. undeveloped Te:
Mature Te (e.g., in judges, lawyers, administrators)
- Fairness
- Logical consistency
- System-building
- Long-term planning
- Ethical clarity
- Calm decision-making
- Responsibility toward society
Immature Te (in the Blindspot)
- Tunnel vision
- Power struggles
- Impatience
- Externalizing blame
- Moral absolutism
- Overreactions to disorder
- Unquestioned submission to authority
This mirrors established psychological research:
- Lawrence Kohlberg’s stages of moral development
- David Keltner’s power paradox
- Authoritarian personality patterns (Adorno)
- Erikson’s identity and moral formation theories
Undeveloped Te does not build laws — it obeys or enforces them without understanding their deeper ethical structure.
This is why people with tertiary Te may become:
- overly deferent to strong leaders
- attracted to strict ideologies
- dependent on others to “take charge”
- fearful of chaos and uncertainty
Or, in some cases:
- reactive and controlling
- aggressive when challenged
- moralistic without nuance
8. How the Blindspot Leads to Manipulation by Others
Because the Blindspot is naive and dependent, others can exploit it.
For ENFPs/ESFPs with tertiary Te:
- They may be drawn to domineering partners or bosses.
- They may accept rules or systems that work against their own interests.
- They may outsource decision-making to others.
- They may comply with authority rather than think critically.
This reflects the Ontolokey notion of externalized control.
The Blindspot seeks a “parent” to take charge.
9. The Blindspot Under Stress
Stress activates regressions — a concept consistent with Jung, Karen Horney, and modern trauma psychology.
When the dominant and auxiliary functions are overwhelmed:
- the psyche drops to its lower functions
- the Blindspot becomes reactive and overinflated
- the person shifts into survival mode
For tertiary Te, stress may show as:
- sudden outbursts of anger
- harsh judgments
- impulsive decisions
- attempts to force order
- a desire to dominate or punish
- panic over loss of structure
This mirrors the “Fight” response in the fight/flight/freeze/fawn model.
10. The Path to Integration: How to Mature the Blindspot
Ontolokey emphasizes that the Blindspot is not destiny; it represents a latent potential.
To mature tertiary Te, individuals can:
1. Learn structured decision-making
- pros/cons analysis
- logical sequencing
- project management basics
- prioritization techniques
2. Develop a personal ethical code
- clarify values
- differentiate ethics from authority
- question unfair systems
3. Practice neutral communication
- nonviolent communication
- assertiveness training
- de-escalation strategies
4. Build executive-function habits
- planning
- scheduling
- organizing
- self-monitoring
5. Learn to differentiate boundaries and control
Te in its primitive form conflates the two; maturity means understanding when structure is necessary — and when it becomes coercion.
When the Blindspot is integrated:
- dependency becomes autonomy
- aggression becomes leadership
- rigidity becomes clarity
- control becomes accountability
11. Why Understanding the Blindspot Matters
Ontolokey’s contribution is timely.
We live in an era of:
- polarization
- authoritarian movements
- social media outrage
- emotional reactivity
- collapsing attention spans
- identity instability
Many of these phenomena reflect unintegrated tertiary functions acting on a societal scale.
By understanding our personal Blindspot, we gain:
- autonomy
- emotional resilience
- relational awareness
- ethical maturity
- psychological wholeness (individuation)
This is directly aligned with Jung’s lifelong mission: to help individuals integrate unconscious material and become more complete human beings.
12. Final Thoughts
The Blindspot, as described by Ontolokey, is not simply a weakness — it is a doorway into our psychological past, a remnant of childhood that continues to shape how we relate to power, structure, and control.
When misunderstood, it creates dependency, manipulation, and reactivity.
When understood and integrated, it becomes a source of clarity, autonomy, and inner strength.
Whether one has tertiary Te, Fi, Si, Ni, or any other function, the challenge is always the same:
To bring the archaic into awareness, and to transform the childlike into the mature.
This is the path from unconscious instinct to conscious choice.
This is the essence of individuation — and the deeper purpose behind Ontolokey’s Blindspot model.
Ontolokey 
Leave a comment